Matterial detection technologies

Technologies used for explosives and other materials detection

 

C.G.R.I.   REPORT

CGRI 2013-64

Unlimited Release

Printed March 2013

 

Disadvantages and Dangers when using electroscopes and electric emitting signals tech

 

Prepared by

C.G.R.I. Laboratories

Simis 15, Nikosia 2044, Cyprus, EU

www.cgri.gr

 

C.G.R.I.  laboratories operated by C.G.R.I. Ltd,

www.cgri.gr

 

Corresponding Author:    Konstantinos Stromatias,

Date:  5 March 2013

Greek Army Brigadier (ret) , Branch of Combat Engineers & Informatics              

Microelectronics systems Designer - InventorResearcher
BSc in Greek Military Academy   

MSc  in Microelectronics and Computer Engineering

PhD candidate in Geophysics   

Contact Details:  info@cgri.gr     

 

Cyprus Geopathetic Research Institute Laboratories

 

NOTICE: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by C.G.R.I., Cyprus, EU.  Neither the C.G.R.I. nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represent that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the C.G.R.I., any agency thereof, or any of their contractors or subcontractors.

The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the C.G.R.I., any agency thereof, or any of their contractors.

 

 

CGRI 2013-64

Printed March 2013

 

 

Disadvantages and Dangers when using electroscopes and electric emitting signals tech

 

 

Contraband Detection Department

 

 

 

C.G.R.I.  Laboratories

2044

Simis 15, Nikosia, Cyprus, EU

 

 

Abstract

 

Continued acts of terrorism using explosive materials throughout the world have led to great interest in long distance explosives detection technology, especially technologies that have a potential for remote on detection. This report was undertaken to investigate of the Disadvantages and Dangers when using electroscopes and electric emitting signals tech

 

 

 

Acknowledgements

 

The authors acknowledge the contributions provided by the Early Warning Systems R & D  Department, C.G.R.I. Laboratories

 

 

 

CONCLUSIONS

 

 

TECHNOLOGY OF ELECTROSCOPES AND ELECTRIC SIGNALS EMITTING TECH IN MATERIAL DETECTION

 

DISADVANTAGES

 

·         WEAKNESS IN  PIN - POINT PROCESS.

This tech could not reach the target more than 100 – 120 meter  close.  At a distance 100 - 120 meters from the target  antennas turn over 360 degrees continuously so the user could not understand the target position or ever reach the target.

 

·         FAILURE TO OPERATE FOR SUFFICIENT TIME.

For over 20 minutes continuously operation, the antennas fully magnetized and loose the target tuning. 

 

·         THE USE OF FREQUENCIES FOR EACH OBJECT - MATERIAL - TARGET IS NOT

TARGET - UNIQUE. For example, the frequency of targeting tortyle, TARGETS  roots of trees, particularly pine trees and other route trees especially when they are into water.

 

·         SELF- TUNED IN NATURAL MINERALS.

Is wide known that Crystal structure minerals, exhibitintrinsic’ electric field. When they receive electrical stimulation originating from a frequency, react to this with an emission, of the same wavelength frequency. So the user understands that is tuned to a target , but he is tuned to a mineral.

 

·         HIGHLY DEPENDENCE ON TEMPERATURE.

All those systems depended a lot from the outer weather conditions AND THEY MISS TARGET EASILY  at hot or cold weather.  So they do the tests inside rooms or from inside vehicles, where the temperature is steady. 

 

·         HIGHLY INFLUENCED BY MAGNETIC FIELDS

 

·         Serious PROBLEMS IN DATA EXCHANGE WITHIN THE MACHINE (DEVICE).

The using of BLUETOOTH tech in transmitting data from the device to a computer overheats the internal device so much that in a few seconds the system loose the target because of a new magnetic field creation  from this action. 

 

·         OBSOLETE  TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT

Every chip and IC inside the plastic cover of the device creates a unique magnetic field that affects the operation of the target tuning.  Especially the high energy needed for the BLUETOOTH  IC operation reconstructs the magnetic tuning process after a few minutes.  The user has only some seconds (5-6) to find the target. After this time no target could be found.

 

·         COMPLETE FAILURE TO FURTHER COORDINATION OF NEW MATERIAL

STRUCTURES

Only us could tuned material structure targets. They don’t know anything about this tech, process and method.

 

·         STRICT DEPENDENCE PRESENCE USER (HUMAN)

This technology could never work as an UNMAN tech. 

 

·         ABSOLUTE DEPENDENCE WEATHER - LOCAL CONDITIONS

Especially in winds over 2 meters/sec.  But not only this. In a variety of temperatures in different kind of places in the world (as India) this tech reacts failure.  In India tuned to the candles of the houses temples as explosives and also finds the tires of the cars as …explosives.  It is this (JUNE 2010) that makes my team to stop using para magnetism tech and electric emitting in finding explosives.  

 

·         TUNED IN TARGETS THAT EXIST … BEHIND THE USER

This is a frequently existing phenomenon. User never knows whether the target is in front or behind him. He only finds the line of the target. By using this tech and systems, user must go to 3 check points  in order to detect to find a target.  Other systems as KYKLOTRON tech finds target only using 2 check points.

 

·         GREAT EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS AND LONG TERM EVERYDAY USE IN THE FIELDS

 

·         RIGID DESIGN SYSTEM

For this reason they could not evolve this tech. Changing the box of the devise is not of course evolvement …


(‘TARGET’ here are the explosives)

 

 

 

DANGERS OF USING

 

TECHNOLOGY OF ELECTROSCOPES AND ELECTRIC SIGNALS EMITTING TECH IN MATERIAL DETECTION

 

·         POSSIBLE FAILURE IN ‘CLEANING’ AREA  FROM EXPLOSIVES PROCESS

 

·         POSSIBLE FAILURE IN ‘PROTECTING’ AN AREA  FROM EXPLOSIVES PROCESS

 

·         INADMISSIBILITY TIME  AS THOSE SYSTEMS TO BE OPERATIONAL EXPLOITABLE  IN ANY KIND OF ACTION (ANTI –TERRORISM, MILITARY etc)

 

·         NOT ACCEPTABLE RESPONSE TIME IN IDENTIFYING TARGETS

 

·         INCREASED LIKELIHOOD OF FALSE IN TRUE TARGET IDENTIFICATION

 

·         INCREASED LIKELIHOOD OF FAILURE AFTER  5-6 SECONDS IN TARGET IDENTIFICATION

 

·         WEAKNESS  OF SATISFACTORY OPERATION IN THE FIELDS

 

·         HIGHLY RISK TECH FOR ANY CUSTOMER

 

·         UNABLE TUNING OF ANY NEW MATERIAL TUNING (LIMITED TUNING SET OF MATERIALS)

 

·         FAILURE IN UNMAN EVOLVE PROCESS

 

·         REQUIREMENTS IN THE FIELD FOR REGULATIONS AND SETTINGS THAT ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE USER – CUSTOMER.

 

·         CREATING TO THE USER A CONFUSION TOWARDS THE TARGET


Detection capabilities of electroscopes and electric emitting signals tech

 

electroscopes and electric emitting signals tech

explosive detection capability  (Yes / No )

 

false tuned to minerals

Y

false tuned to trees & roots

Y

false  tuned to chalcopyrite minerals

Y

false tuned to magnetic fields

Y

cell phones  reflaction   jaming

Y

parapets, walls, building, etc independent detection

Y

pin point detection

N

Localize target

N

is harmless to human health (x rays , etc)

N

C4ISR  capabilities

N

communication using Wi-Fi

N

communication using Bluetooth

Y

communication using cell phone

N

GPS embedded on search device

N

magnetic compass embedded

N

needs human energy to work

Y

detects explosive from 0-5 meters

Y

detects explosive from 0-50 meters

Y

detects explosive from 0-100 meters

Y

detects explosive from 5-100 meters

Y

detects explosive from 100-1000 meters

N

detects explosive from 100-2000 meters

N

detects explosive from 0-5000 meters

N

detects explosive from 0-10.000 meters

N

detects explosive from 0-20.000 meters

N

detects explosive from 0  -  > 20.000 meters

N

detects in search angle > 60 degrees

N

attracted from explosive that  is opposite of the system

Y

can tuned in every distinguish material structure ?

N

 

Explosives detection tech capability  (Y/N)

QNR

Electroscope

Electric

 emitting

signals

false tuned to minerals

N

Y

Y

 false tuned to trees & roots

N

Y

Y

false  tuned to chalcopyrite minerals

N

Y

Y

 false tuned to magnetic fields

N

Y

Y

cell phones  reflaction   jaming

N

N

N

parapets, walls, building,etc independent detection

Y

Y

Y

pin point detection

Y

N

N

Localize target

Y

Y

Y

Localize target and represent on GIS map

Y

Y

Y

is harmless to human health (x rays , etc)

N

N

N

C4ISR  capabilities

Y

N

N

communication using Wi-Fi

Y

N

N

communication using bluetooth

Y

Y

Y

communication using cell phone

Y

N

N

GPS emmbeded on search device

Y

N

N

magnetic compass embeded

Y

N

N

needs cards or explosive matterial on board

N

N

N

needs use of electrostatic gloves

N

N

N

needs human energy to work

N

N

N

detects explosive from 0-5 meters

Y

N

N

detects explosive from 0-50 meters

Y

N

N

detects explosive from 0-100 meters

Y

N

N

detects explosive from 5-100 meters

Y

N

N

detects explosive from 100-1000 meters

Y

Y

Y

detects explosive from 100-2000 meters

Y

N

N

detects explosive from 0-5000 meters

Y

N

N

detects explosive from 0-10.000 meters

Y

N

N

detects explosive from 0-20.000 meters

Y

N

N

detects explosive from 0  -  > 20.000 meters

Y

N

N

detects in search angle > 60 degrees

Y

N

N

attracted from explosive that  is oposite of the system

N

Y

Y

can tuned in every distinguish matterial structure ?

Y

N

N

 

 

Cyprus Geopathetic Research Institute Laboratories